The drive for more airports directly contradicts goverment targets to reduce CO2 emissions
411
John Lancaster
Government is operating an outdated and discredited policy of "predict and provide" in favour of air travel. Air travel is currently only so cheap and popular because it is not fully paying the cost of the environmental damage it causes. Substantial tax on aviation fuel would be a good start with the proceeds invested in sustainable transport initiatives.
410
Jimbo and the Jet Set
End unnecessary air travel - which is pretty much all air travel. End destruction of communities by noise and air pollution from airport expansion
409
Jo Melzack
Cheap air travel is a massive contributor to climate change. The government cannot on the one hand commit to reducing CO2 emissions and on the other support airport expansion - it's time for real positive action to increase investment in development of less polluting forms of transport.
408
Chris Lang
No more airport expansions!
407
Lyn Brayshaw
We should all look after the planet and do all we can to protect it
406
Dr K Tai
Reforming the economics of aviation should be on the top of the political agenda.
405
Rachel
A huge amount of airport use is to transport consumer products back and forth across the world, including the food we eat. Much of this import/export is completely needless and wasteful - perhaps instead of expanding transport infrastucture to accommodate this and allow it to increase, the government should be looking more closely at the whole system, and finding ways of reducing the endless imports/exports, particularly of food - i.e. by encouraging localisation of the economy, so that more and more of our needs are met closer to home.
404
Ella
We need to s-l-o-w down a bit...
403
Meinhard Benn
Airplanes emit up to ten times more CO2 per person per kilometer than a car does. I think this is reason enough to have a critical review on how we use airplanes at the moment.