Below is the name and personal statement of opposition
to airport expansion of everyone who has signed the pledge.
Note, we've had some problems with spam. We're working on a long-term fix, but
for now, if you notice spam entries, please email the Airport Pledge Technical Contact:
Scientists and anyone with an inch of common sense alike all agree that the current pattern of ecological exploitation and over-indulgence cannot continue: there is no light at the end of this tunnel. and yet, the elites still put big business and the smallest chance of a quick dollar above all else. this must end, and one way or another, it will.
2440
Mrs Rollinson
2439
ruthw
I live under Gatwick's flight path and strongly oppose (on personal grounds!) any expansion of this particular airport. However, given that the price of oil is rapidly heading skywards, the age of cheap, abundant flights may be coming to an end. Expanding any airport ignores both the enormous environmental damage that air travel does, and the impact on communities and individuals beneath ever-widening flight paths. We should accept that until alternative fuel sources are found (if they ever are) air travel is fundamentally unsound, both economically and ecologically. Britain's economy seems to be doing just fine, thank you, without thousands more toxic, deafening flights arriving and leaving every day. Expanding airports will cost taxpayers billions and simply create more short-term profit for private sector companies and their shareholders. Frankly, we've got better things to do with the money!
2438
Ted Pennings
Corporations need to stop destroying the habitat and our communities.
2437
gelfling
somewhere we need to draw the line. no more.
2436
Adam
A campaign of airport expansion is a display of sickening hypocrisy from a government which claims to be concerned with climate change.
2435
Simon Foxall
To the Government: Halting airport expansion and raising fares will undoubtedly been seen as a generally unpopular decision as we live in a world of instant, apparantly implication-free gratification, which we want cheaper and cheaper. It is not possible to continue to satisfy those views. We have a responsibility to our world or we WILL KILL IT. There is no counter arguement.
2434
Vic WJ
airport expansion is contradictory to all agreements and pledges to reduce CO2 emmisions by 2015. Air usage is in large used for relativley well off peoples holidays - not a good enough reason to ruin our planet for all the generations to come.
2433
tricia wilkinson
"growth is over-rated"
" hasn't someone considered the alternatives"
2432
simon robinson
I strongly oppose the propose airport expansion. The airline industry is one of the fastest-growing polluters and CO2 emitters, and if we do not halt this expansion I believe there will be grave environmental consequences.